<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <title>Finetune the World — Research &amp; Notes</title>
  <subtitle>Experiments, derivations and field notes on fine-tuning and post-training.</subtitle>
  <link href="https://finetunetheworld.com/feed.xml" rel="self"/>
  <link href="https://finetunetheworld.com/research/"/>
  <id>https://finetunetheworld.com/feed.xml</id>
  <updated>2026-10-30T00:00:00Z</updated>
  <author><name>Finetune the World Research</name></author>
  <entry>
    <title>LoRA rank vs full fine-tuning: an experiment on structured extraction</title>
    <link href="https://finetunetheworld.com/research/lora-rank-vs-full-fine-tuning/"/>
    <id>https://finetunetheworld.com/research/lora-rank-vs-full-fine-tuning/</id>
    <published>2026-10-30T00:00:00Z</published>
    <updated>2026-10-30T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <summary>We fine-tuned Qwen2.5-0.5B on a claims-extraction task with LoRA ranks 1–64 and full fine-tuning. Exact match went from 18% to 100%; rank mattered most on unseen formats. Code, data and results included.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Lab notes from our fine-tuning research</title>
    <link href="https://finetunetheworld.com/notes/"/>
    <id>https://finetunetheworld.com/notes/</id>
    <published>2026-10-30T00:00:00Z</published>
    <updated>2026-10-30T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <summary>Dated, short findings from our fine-tuning research: LoRA rank and robustness, the real cost of a training run, DPO β, logits memory and evaluation sample sizes.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Your LLM judge is shrinking your results. A 1978 estimator fixes it.</title>
    <link href="https://finetunetheworld.com/research/llm-judge-bias-correction/"/>
    <id>https://finetunetheworld.com/research/llm-judge-bias-correction/</id>
    <published>2026-10-27T00:00:00Z</published>
    <updated>2026-10-30T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <summary>An imperfect LLM judge attenuates measured improvements and can flip model rankings. Simulations, the Rogan–Gladen correction from epidemiology, and how big a calibration set you need.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Self-hosting a fine-tuned model vs paying per token: the break-even model</title>
    <link href="https://finetunetheworld.com/research/self-hosting-vs-api-break-even/"/>
    <id>https://finetunetheworld.com/research/self-hosting-vs-api-break-even/</id>
    <published>2026-10-25T00:00:00Z</published>
    <updated>2026-10-30T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <summary>When does a self-hosted fine-tuned model beat a per-token API? A parametric cost model with a break-even formula, base case of ~1M requests/month, and a sensitivity analysis of every input.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Fine-tuning compute: FLOPs, GPU-hours and what a training run really costs</title>
    <link href="https://finetunetheworld.com/research/fine-tuning-compute-cost/"/>
    <id>https://finetunetheworld.com/research/fine-tuning-compute-cost/</id>
    <published>2026-10-23T00:00:00Z</published>
    <updated>2026-10-30T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <summary>A transparent compute model for fine-tuning: 6N vs 4N FLOPs per token for full vs LoRA training, MFU, GPU-hours and dollar costs for 0.5B–72B models, with sensitivity analysis.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>How much GPU memory does it take to fine-tune an LLM?</title>
    <link href="https://finetunetheworld.com/research/gpu-memory-for-fine-tuning/"/>
    <id>https://finetunetheworld.com/research/gpu-memory-for-fine-tuning/</id>
    <published>2026-10-21T00:00:00Z</published>
    <updated>2026-10-30T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <summary>VRAM requirements for fine-tuning 0.5B–72B models with full fine-tuning, LoRA and QLoRA, derived from real model configs: equations, tables, activation memory and which GPU you need.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>How many evaluation examples do you need to compare two LLMs?</title>
    <link href="https://finetunetheworld.com/research/eval-sample-size/"/>
    <id>https://finetunetheworld.com/research/eval-sample-size/</id>
    <published>2026-10-18T00:00:00Z</published>
    <updated>2026-10-30T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <summary>Power analysis for LLM evals: analytic sample sizes, a Monte Carlo study of paired vs unpaired designs, and why scoring both models on the same items can halve the examples you need.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>DPO from first principles, and what β really does with finite data</title>
    <link href="https://finetunetheworld.com/research/dpo-beta-finite-data/"/>
    <id>https://finetunetheworld.com/research/dpo-beta-finite-data/</id>
    <published>2026-10-14T00:00:00Z</published>
    <updated>2026-10-30T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <summary>A step-by-step derivation of Direct Preference Optimization from the KL-regularized RLHF objective, plus a tabular simulation showing that with limited data β barely controls how far the policy moves.</summary>
  </entry>
</feed>
